This is one of the most thoughtful and honest approaches to this confusing UX Designer title that I’ve ever seen. I can see that being rather vague, the field attracts many practitioners who are looking for something revolutionary that they want to marinade and preserve for good. Like methods and user research, as two fundamental key factors of being a UX Designer. Although I’m curious about the field, I could never call myself a UX Designer, mostly because I don’t “design” anything in a sense of putting together screens/parts in Invision or Adobe XD. The title has always been strange in the first place, and now I understand how shallow, in a sense, it is. An amazing article, like it a lot :)